Our agenda
The two breakout questions
Short term: research and innovation in an ethical manner, believable and grounded in principle, with value-based ESG made visible and testable, and intentional workshops that show the values in member work.
Long term: business as a force for good; SALT becomes the trusted source on value-based ESG, strengthening ESG performance through research.
Three initiatives: (1) research built on the three theories (moral legitimacy, pragmatic, stakeholder); (2) intentional workshops showcasing member work; (3) an agreed ethical and verifiable use of AI in research.
Resources: members' time in kind, access to sources (books, Google-linked sites), AI tools on free tiers, verification effort, workshop spaces at SALT convenings, and peer review of the method.
What the group settled on
The agreed keywords
Mission is the doing. Vision is the seeing (the goal). The vision is inspired by the mission.
Q1 · short and long term
Vision
Research and innovation, ethically
Establish research done in an ethical manner, believable and grounded in principle. Keep SALT's founding background: the convergence of faith-based values with ESG principles, rooted in stewardship, compassion and justice. Make value-based ESG visible and testable, and run intentional workshops that show the values in real member work.
Business as a force for good
Faith-based business leaders using business as a force for good: addressing poverty and promoting sustainable development through ethical and value-driven practices, uniting the strengths of faith and business for positive social, economic and environmental impact. SALT becomes the trusted source on value-based ESG, strengthening ESG performance through research.
Q2 · two to three initiatives
Initiatives
Built on the three theories
Moral legitimacy (intrinsic): is the organisation judged by whether its conduct truly reflects the values it professes? Are the values embedded, or only displayed?
Pragmatic (extrinsic): is the theory implemented in how the organisation actually carries out its work? Do practice and promise align?
Stakeholder (people-centred): stewardship, justice and all the values, for everyone affected.
These make the research believable and testable.
Intentional workshops that show the values
Not trainings. Spaces where founders, innovators, artists and members showcase what they have done and what they are doing. When people see real examples they understand the values on the wall of what SALT stands for.
"The vision is the main thing." — a member
Ethical and verifiable use of AI
Use AI as a first step, but ask it for the citations of where the information comes from. Then researchers go visit those places and verify directly, using books and other sources. Human verification decides, because AI can build a website quickly but cannot do a real backend properly.
Weigh AI's positive and negative effects on the environment, on the social, and on governance, and keep asking: positive or negative, should we move ahead?
Q2 · what it takes
Resources required
| Resource | Source | Initiative |
|---|---|---|
| Members' time (in kind) | TWG 2 members | All three |
| Access to sources | Open web, books, Google-linked sites | 3 · AI |
| AI tools (chat platforms) | Free tiers | 3 · AI |
| Verification effort | Members visit cited sources | 3 · AI |
| Workshop spaces and slots | SALT convenings, member venues | 2 · Workshops |
| Peer review of the method | Members with domain knowledge | 1, 3 |
Closing
One-line ask to the room
Responsible research
Citation
SALT Network planning and breakout sessions, 23, 24 and 25 September 2026, notes of TWG 2 discussions.SALT Network TWG Convening agenda, Strathmore University, 25 September 2026.
Contributors: [add participant names for citation].